Which type of maintenance typically costs less than reactive maintenance when routine costs are considered?

Planned maintenance is often more cost-effective than reactive maintenance because it involves regular and systematic inspections, servicing, and upkeep of equipment or trees, allowing for the identification and resolution of potential issues before they escalate into more serious problems. This proactive approach helps to avoid the larger expenses associated with unplanned repairs and emergencies, which can disrupt operations and incur higher labor and material costs. By budgeting for and scheduling maintenance activities, organizations can effectively manage costs and ensure that assets are maintained in good condition, thus reducing the risk of failures that would require urgent and potentially costly corrective actions. Moreover, routine maintenance activities tend to align with established schedules and practices, allowing for better resource management and minimizing downtime.