Which statement is EMOTIVELY FALSE?

The statement that "the feet absorb pesticides better than arms" is regarded as emotionally false because research indicates that the skin on the feet is typically thicker and has fewer blood vessels than the skin on other parts of the body, such as the arms. This thickness can limit the absorption of substances, including pesticides, compared to areas with thinner skin and a higher vascularity.

In contrast, the other statements align with established understandings of skin absorption. The hands, for example, are known to effectively absorb pesticides due to their larger surface area and thinner skin, which can facilitate permeation. The forearms are also considered significant sites of absorption because of their exposed skin during pesticide application. Additionally, the eyes are indeed recognized as a sensitive absorption area, due to the mucous membranes, which can quickly absorb chemicals and lead to systemic effects.